10-16-2012 03:53 PM
Hi folks,
We've been testing UDS for a while, and have run into a couple of things that management consider show-stopper issues. While I doubt much can be done about these, I thought I'd ask in any case.
Due to these issues, management has put a halt to further testing of Fusion and are looking at alternate solutions. I don't know if anyone else has solved these problems, but to me these seem like pretty big holes in the solution.
10-17-2012 05:51 PM
I am waiting for BES 10, before I implement the UDS. I am hoping that they will provide something similar to the BES, that will control the email.
In addition to your complaints...
Android support is minimal, but it's hard to blame RIM for that, since the Android OS has so few standard security features to control. RIM needs to build it's own email client (like IBM did, with it's own Lotus Notes Traveler), to control anything on those devices.
BDS and UDS email is all routed, without any filtering capability.
Application deployment is not dependable.
Since the devices have to connect to the Active Sync server separately, Administration of the devices now has to be done within two different applications.
BUT... I am very hopefull that BES 10 will solve some of these issues, because I don't want to look like an **bleep** for waiting... instead of jumping ship like everyone else...![]()
10-22-2012 12:15 PM
For issue #1. I just tested on an IPhone with UDS 6.1.2 and if you delete the Mobile Fusion Client from the device within 15 minutes all profiles pushed out through UDS were deleted.
10-23-2012 11:46 AM
Issue #1 is a problem no matter what MDM solution you use with iOS. I haven't seen one yet that will remove MDM profiles when the app is removed. But you can still push wipe commands to the device and we have a policy set if the app doesn't check in for a certain number of days to send a wipe command. We don't do this with UDS but another vendor's product.
Issue #2 can be solved be requiring some sort of authentication that is provided by the MDM solution, such as a user certificate. Our Wi-Fi and Activesync authentication requires a user cert that deployed by the MDM solution with SCEP.
One advantage that Blackberry has promised for BES 10 with iOS is to be able to do ActiveSync over the BES network with some sort of proxy service on the BES 10 server (i.e. MDS). They can do this today with Playbooks and BDS.
10-30-2012 08:48 AM - edited 10-30-2012 08:49 AM
@-BD- I haven't see this behavior in my testing but will try it again and see what happens.
10-30-2012 08:50 AM
10-30-2012 02:59 PM - edited 10-31-2012 12:08 AM
@-BD- I haven't see this behavior in my testing but will try it again and see what happens.
This was a recent change. I don't remember off the top of my head which release changed it but in the original UDS release profiles remained on the device if you deleted the client unless a admin manually sent out a command to wipe work data.
11-01-2012 07:40 AM
Am I understanding this correctly, the profiles can be removed after the Mobile Fusion Client has been uninstalled? Or, are they removed during the uninstallation of the Client?
Another hypothetical related to Issue #1. On an Android device, an app's data cache can be cleared - effectively performing a "factory reset" of the app. I assume this action severs all communication between the device and UDS (yes/no?). I have noticed that some of the changes pushed out to a phone are not removed, presumably because the Mobile Fusion Client made those changes within Android and they are not stored in the app per se. For example, after clearing the Mobile Fusion app's cache I noticed the phone retained the Wi-Fi profile pushed to it.
As an administrator, is there a mechanism in Mobile Fusion to remove these left-overs after a user clears the app's cache?
11-01-2012 10:49 AM - edited 11-01-2012 10:50 AM
@-BD- Yup, tested it on a couple of iOS devices, and after removing the Mobile Fusion client the various profiles were automatically removed within a few minutes. Glad to see this has been resolved.
11-09-2012 01:11 AM
did you set any special policy setting for this ?