01-15-2013 05:24 PM
Yes, you want amazing, but RIM never said the apps had to be "amazing". They said the apps have to have flow, be connected, use the native UI, etc. And if you make an app that does this, RIM will stamp your app as a B4BB and you will have an opportunity to get 10K (etc, etc, etc). If the app had to be "amazing", then there would have been a lot less developers trying for B4BB/10K (or even BB10) if the criteria was at a level that most would not achieve. Also, an amazing app is subjective. There are not a lot of apps that I would consider amazing. None of the core BB10 apps that I have seen I would consider amazing. They are good and well done, but not amazing.
I hope RIM can chime in here soon. Seems the big issues are:
01-15-2013 07:55 PM - edited 01-16-2013 11:26 AM
Well, I decided to poor over the terms and conditions to see if we are missing something. Part of the rules can be subjective. RIM has up to 10 days to send an email if you get rejected. So there is a very good chance that many of us will not get the feedback needed, corrections, re-submission, re-testing and final approval by the BB10 rollout.
Here is an abbreviate outline of the terms:
Rules:
Testing criteria:
I think many AIR apps might get hit on "performance", so I hope there is some latitude with that since RIM has not provided stage3D that would address some of those issues. Same with WebWorks. Android is already excluded unless they are a game and fit the UX guidelines.
01-15-2013 07:56 PM
01-15-2013 08:29 PM
01-28-2013 05:38 PM
TapyHold
-- Multimedia Book
App Page : TapyHold
02-06-2013 02:52 AM
Jump Birdy Jump has been approved for the Build For BlackBerry Label. I'm so happy. It's a really good game, you should try it ![]()
Jean-Claude
02-12-2013 10:14 AM
One of my app was rejected because "it does not meet the criteria as outlined in user benefits".
Well, its a calculator for clothing sizes. Its a cascades app, fluid and the UI is pretty nice and it got best reviews so far - so whats wrong here. What can be wrong with a sizes calculator in terms of "user benefits" . This app IS USEFUL, so the user has benefits.
I have two more apps of this kind - small utility apps, but very useful, well designed and with best reviews.
But now i am sure these apps will be rejected too. I wasted my time to get 3 smaller apps ready, instead of one big app which might be "amazing" enough to meet the critera.
I can only quote @jtegen: "RIM never said the apps had to be "amazing". They said the apps have to have flow, be connected, use the native UI, etc. And if you make an app that does this, RIM will stamp your app as a B4BB and you will have an opportunity to get 10K (etc, etc, etc)".
I have watched a BBJam webcast about B4BB months ago. A game was shown, which should meet the criteria. And this game was extremely simple with an ugly UI. It was said: As long as you follow the checklist everything is OK.
Nothing is OK.
02-12-2013 03:44 PM
I also recall the webcast on B4BB, and the sample app they used was this simple lottery number picker app. From what we're seeing now, that sample app would never get B4BB certified.
02-13-2013 12:25 AM
georg22 wrote:
One of my app was rejected because "it does not meet the criteria as outlined in user benefits".
Well, its a calculator for clothing sizes. Its a cascades app, fluid and the UI is pretty nice and it got best reviews so far - so whats wrong here. What can be wrong with a sizes calculator in terms of "user benefits" . This app IS USEFUL, so the user has benefits.
I have two more apps of this kind - small utility apps, but very useful, well designed and with best reviews.
But now i am sure these apps will be rejected too. I wasted my time to get 3 smaller apps ready, instead of one big app which might be "amazing" enough to meet the critera.
I can only quote @jtegen: "RIM never said the apps had to be "amazing". They said the apps have to have flow, be connected, use the native UI, etc. And if you make an app that does this, RIM will stamp your app as a B4BB and you will have an opportunity to get 10K (etc, etc, etc)".
I have watched a BBJam webcast about B4BB months ago. A game was shown, which should meet the criteria. And this game was extremely simple with an ugly UI. It was said: As long as you follow the checklist everything is OK.
Nothing is OK.
You seemed to have answered your own complaint... if your app idea has been broken into 3 apps, that means the app you submited is lacking 2/3 of what it could do. (Unless I misunderstood what you said above.) Take for example my SCUBA dive planning app: http://appworld.blackberry.com/webstore/content/20
02-13-2013 02:59 AM
I've been making a list of apps that seem to be Built for BlackBerry approved, so we can refer to them before the new store section gets added. Here's a Google spreadsheet if anyone wants to add any: http://tinyurl.com/b9ap92p
| Column A: I has a Built for BlackBerry icon, D has official BfB description text |