03-01-2009 10:53 AM
We have a recurring problem with OS 4.7 and the Storm. It goes like this: A customer has a Curve (or other older device) and upgrades to a Storm. When he migrates to the new device, he brings over our OS 4.2 version of the applicaiton to the Storm.
Of course, the Storm recognizes that our 4.2 version is not touch-capable and places it in the "compatibility" penalty box. He then figures out that we have a Storm version on the web site, so he downloads this version.
Unfortunately, OS 4.7 has already placed the app in the penalty box, so the app is still running in compatibility mode (blue border, permanent keyboard). He finally contacts our support desk, and gets instructions to completely delete the application, reboot, and re-download the 4.7 version.
So here is the problem: sometimes this works, and sometimes it does not. We are accumulating a growing (and very upset) group of customers who are stuck forever in "compatibility mode".
Has anybody figured out a surefire method to disable this &*%^@*)(#&@ compatibility mode?
Solved! Go to Solution.
03-02-2009 11:28 AM
I've had this happen a few times.
Maybe you'll just have to tell users to turn off compatiblity mode in advaced options. ![]()
I still think the compatiblity mode was a big mistake.
Why couldn't they have just mapped touch events to NavigationMovement?
I think compatiblity mode should be OFF by default.
Let the developer or end user turn it on if they really want it.
Jon
03-02-2009 12:20 PM
Thanks, we'll try the manual disable.
I have also recevied a note from RIM to set the JAD file with the following property:
RIMTouchCompatibilityMode = false
Has anybody tried this?
03-02-2009 01:18 PM
I think you're missing a dash in the JAD attribute name, as explained in this knowledge base article:
03-12-2009 04:28 AM - edited 03-12-2009 04:32 AM
Tried added the lines
RIM-TouchCompatibilityMode: false
RIM-TouchCompatibilityMode-UserChangeable: true
It will NOT work if you are updating an existing application which was complied with a JDE older then 4.7.0. It will only work if you are doing a clean install.
Does anyone know anyway around this? Other than the following user unfriendly methods:
1) Ask the user to manually turn off Compatibility, 2) ask the user to do a clean install, 3) Rename my application package name.... (please no)
04-20-2009 02:07 AM
Hii,
I have same problem and after changing jad with above mentioned values sometimes it works but sometimes it fails to show menu to user.
Did anyone find the solution ??? RIM guys any sort of help ?? coz i dnt want to rename my app (noo!!!) .
Thanks in advance.
I hv complied my code in JDE 4.2.1
06-13-2009 07:40 AM
Using "false" or "true" did not seem to make any difference. But using this did :
RIM-TouchCompatibilityMode: 0 RIM-TouchCompatibilityMode-UserChangeable: 1
07-13-2009 10:46 AM
I am in the same situation. And, from multiple posts in various threads, it is clear that no one has come up with a viable solution.
Testing an application built with 4.3.0 on Storm 9500 simulator.
The very first try with any settings was to set:
RIM-TouchCompatibilityMode-UserChangeable: true
RIM-TouchCompatibilityMode: true
I built and started the simulator, but then killed it realizing I wanted RIM-TouchCompatibilityMode: false set instead.
After that, I have tried:
RIM-TouchCompatibilityMode-UserChangeable: true
RIM-TouchCompatibilityMode: false
RIM-TouchCompatibilityMode-UserChangeable: false
RIM-TouchCompatibilityMode: false
RIM-TouchCompatibilityMode-UserChangeable: 1
RIM-TouchCompatibilityMode: 0
I have tried deleting and recreating the project in Eclipse.
I have tried uninstalling, deleting the directory, and reinstalling the Storm simulator.
In every case, the Storm simulator continues to show the application in Compatibility Mode, and in every case the menu option to 'Disable compatibility mode' is available in Options > Advanced Options > Applications
Also, strangely, I notice that the .jad file is reordered on every compile, so that RIM-TouchCompatibilityMode-UserChangeable is at the top of the file. I don't think (hope) this is the culprit, but thought it worth mentioning.
If I manually disable Compatibility Mode, it works nicely. But instructing all current users to manually disable this will be.. challenging..
Suggestions on how to proceed?
07-13-2009 10:49 AM