Thank you for visiting the BlackBerry Support Community Forums.
BlackBerry will be closing the BlackBerry Support Community Forums Device Forums on April 1st (Developers, see below)
BlackBerry remains committed to providing excellent customer support to our customers. We are delighted to direct you to the CrackBerry Forums, a well-established and thorough support channel, for continued BlackBerry support. Please visit http://forums.crackberry.com or http://crackberry.com/ask. You can also continue to visit BlackBerry Support or the BlackBerry Knowledge Base for official support options available for your BlackBerry Smartphone.
"When we launched CrackBerry.com 10 years ago, we set out to make it a fun and useful destination where BlackBerry Smartphone owners could share their excitement and learn to unleash the full potential of their BlackBerry. A decade later, the CrackBerry community is as active and passionate as ever and I know our knowledgeable members and volunteers will be excited to welcome and assist more BlackBerry owners with their questions."
- Kevin Michaluk, Founder, CrackBerry.com
Developers, for more information about the BlackBerry Developer Community please review Join the Conversation on the BlackBerry Developer Community Forums found on Inside BlackBerry.
02-08-2011 01:43 PM
just like your previous thread, this is a known bug discussed in the following link:
i recommend reading that page to know what to be ready for in regards to possible bugs. good luck!
02-08-2011 01:55 PM
Would be nice to know how development teams are organized at RIM. Some things do break on large projects, but a +0.0.1 update have critical item fail after only about a month after the previous update. Either they have configuration/build issues to resolve, QA not fully implementing their test procedures, and/or personal responsibility at the development level to make certain their portions are always working with each build. Many of us have been there, but a month before production release? Yikes. Hope to get 0.9.4 next week.
02-08-2011 01:58 PM
I'm guessing it's "all of the above". Seeing such breakage on what is supposed to be a minor upgrade release leaves me very wary about development on this platform.
02-12-2011 12:04 PM
I'm not sure whether this explains anything yet (hoping for confirmation from @tneil), but I just posted a question about possible explanation in a Web Development forum thread. If it's true, then I'm suddenly quite a bit less concerned about the likely state of the release product as compared to the simulator.